# Note control delayed with synth \`dsaw\`

**URL:** <https://in-thread.sonic-pi.net/t/note-control-delayed-with-synth-dsaw/5293>\
**Category:** Support, Help & Resources\
**Created:** [March 22, 2021, 9:50pm UTC](https://in-thread.sonic-pi.net/t/note-control-delayed-with-synth-dsaw/5293 "2021-03-22T21:50:09Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 14

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mlange](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex017/user_avatar/in-thread.sonic-pi.net/mlange/32/1899_2.png) [@mlange](https://in-thread.sonic-pi.net/u/mlange)\
**Post date:** [March 26, 2021, 5:49pm UTC](https://in-thread.sonic-pi.net/t/note-control-delayed-with-synth-dsaw/5293/14 "2021-03-26T17:49:16Z")

</div>

Thanks for this further suggestion! So you refer to `sound_card_buffer_size` here?

When I go below 512, I get no sound at all. With 512, the delay seems unchanged, but I get artifacts in the sound. With 1024 and above, sound is ok, but the delay if still there. Not being able to go lower is probably a limitation of my sound card…

Also, I am wondering why the `tb303` does not show any visible delay, as it should also be affected by the buffer boundary “error”.

In the project where the issue first appeared for me, I could circumvent its audible effect by shortenting the first note played by the respective synth (published to in\_thread [here](https://in-thread.sonic-pi.net/t/first-sonic-pi-track-made-with-literate-programming/5308/7)). But still, I would be interested in ways to preventing the issue from ground.

---

_[View the full topic](https://in-thread.sonic-pi.net/t/note-control-delayed-with-synth-dsaw/5293)._
